Author summary
12%3 analyzed articles/videos841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryan Schuerman results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Recency Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 946 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,524 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,862 of 9,471 authors). This Bryan Schuerman is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Bryan Schuerman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
28%Bryan Schuerman (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,524
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate