Author summary
77%9 analyzed articles/videos2,611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Carter results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 856 hits. Analysis detected 11,544 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,224 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,397 of 8,802 authors). This Justin Carter is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Justin Carter
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
51%Justin Carter (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,224
Article count: 9
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score9 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.6%6.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate