Gizmodo76%

No, 'Alien: Romulus 2' Didn't Get Canceled 8%

By Justin Carter77%

8/2/2026, 7:30:38 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 938 faulty-reasoning hits from 341 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (25,271 of 27,320 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the article peer group.

Rumors of *Alien: Romulus* not getting a follow up have been greatly exaggerated. 
Over the weekend, outlet World of Reel alleged that the unannounced sequel had been “indefinitely shelved,” bordering on “may not ever happen.” 
The website cited several reasons for this, including David Jonsson recently landing *Black Panther 3* and his *Romulus* costar Cailee Spaeny rumored for *X-Men*. 
But the biggest obstacle was allegedly Ridley Scott: returning in a producer role, he was said to be too hands on, since this sequel will bring back David, the android played by Michael Fassbender last seen in 2017's *Alien: Covenant*. 
World of Reel claimed Fassbender “practically signed on,” but Scott refused to let the actor join the project, despite its completed script. 
This standstill then sent *Alien: Romulus* director/co-writer Fede Álvarez—who isn’t directing this next movie, but wrote and produced it—“into a tailspin” and to leave the sequel entirely. 
“Currently no path forward for the sequel,” said the outlet, whose story subsequently went viral and sent *Alien* fans into despair. 
And then came 20th Century Studios president Steve Asbell, using X to dispute the story with one simple word: “Nope.” 
That's currently the final word on the matter, at least from the studio. 
World of Reel, meanwhile, has yet to update or correct its initial reporting at time of writing. 
News on the *Romulus* sequel been nonexistent, save for Álvarez stating in 2025 that filming would begin that October. 
In this day and age, months of silence can be equivalent to a quiet death for movies or other projects, not helped by Disney being in a cancelling mood lately. 
Even so, Asbell’s declaration that the story of *Alien: Romulus* will continue has fans hopeful. 
Now, it's just a matter of being patient for more news. 
Want more io9 news? 
Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.3%Justin Carter: 5.2%Gizmodo: 3.7%Confirmation Bias10.3%This article: 7.0%Justin Carter: 1.4%Gizmodo: 1.2%Anchoring Bias7.0%This article: 32.0%Justin Carter: 3.3%Gizmodo: 2.9%Availability Heuristic32.0%This article: 7.0%Justin Carter: 1.3%Gizmodo: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic7.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.8%Gizmodo: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.8%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 4.9%Gizmodo: 4.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 7.9%Justin Carter: 1.0%Gizmodo: 0.6%Loss Aversion7.9%This article: 3.8%Justin Carter: 1.1%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.8%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Justin Carter: 4.1%Gizmodo: 3.4%Optimism Bias7.6%This article: 20.5%Justin Carter: 2.2%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias20.5%This article: 32.8%Justin Carter: 7.0%Gizmodo: 7.1%Negativity Bias32.8%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Justin Carter: 0.6%Gizmodo: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error11.7%This article: 11.7%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias11.7%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.0%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 4.2%Gizmodo: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.4%Justin Carter: 2.1%Gizmodo: 1.4%Recency Bias9.4%This article: 5.9%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.3%Primacy Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.3%Justin Carter: 2.8%Gizmodo: 3.6%Appeal to Authority12.3%This article: 8.8%Justin Carter: 2.4%Gizmodo: 1.3%False Dilemma8.8%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.4%Justin Carter: 5.7%Gizmodo: 4.9%Hasty Generalization21.4%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.3%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.5%Justin Carter: 3.2%Gizmodo: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion6.5%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.9%Justin Carter: 3.1%Gizmodo: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.9%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.2%Justin Carter: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof6.2%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 4.0%Gizmodo: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.9%Justin Carter: 1.9%Gizmodo: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.9%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.4%Justin Carter: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground4.4%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 6.6%Gizmodo: 3.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 2.2%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.0%Justin Carter: 6.1%Gizmodo: 11.9%Biased Writer Voice7.0%This article: 3.2%Justin Carter: 2.0%Gizmodo: 1.5%Indoctrination3.2%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Justin Carter: 5.8%Gizmodo: 2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.7%

341 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers33%attributed speech229writer words
Selected voice

World of Reel

100%flagged-word coverage
65 attributed words58% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -17.5 ptsWriter: 17.5%World of Reel: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.5 ptsWriter: 10.5%World of Reel: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%World of Reel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.