Gizmodo74%

Time Is Running Out For 'Barbie 2' to Happen 47%

By Justin Carter78%

8/1/2026, 11:50:17 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 895 faulty-reasoning hits from 362 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.2% and a BS Rank of 47% (15,866 of 29,795 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the article peer group.

Over three years since Greta Gerwig’s Barbie came out and became a global phenomenon (and half of one), a follow up could be feasible. 
Maybe. 
Per the New York Times, Warner Bros. has spent months in negotiations with Gerwig, along with top-billed stars Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling, to do another movie. 
The apparent aim is to get the film into production “as soon as possible,” but there’s one issue: it’s got until December to lock deals down before rights revert back to Mattel. 
As is, WB head David Zaslav isn’t willing to sign off on the offers made to talent. 
Currently, Gerwig and the actors would get a cut of the profit if the film hits certain benchmarks, and some upfront raises. 
(For example, the NYT reveals Gosling would get upfront pay of $20 million.) 
Zaslav has reportedly deemed these offers “too generous,” with a WB rep telling the outlet the three turned down the most recent offer in May. 
For what it’s worth, the Barbie movie made $1.448 billion and became the studio’s highest-grossing film and of 2023. 
(To say nothing of its various Oscar nominations and two Golden Globes wins.) 
But 2023 is not 2026: not only is Paramount trying to acquire the studio, it’s two 2026 tentpoles, The Bride! 
and Supergirl, fizzled at the box office. 
If a deal is locked down, it’ll still be a while for Barbie 2 to happen. 
Gerwig’s currently finishing her Narnia movie for Netflix, and Ryan Gosling’s to headline Marvel’s Ghost Rider movie in 2028. 
She and co-writer/husband Noah Baumbach reportedly have a story they’re ready to write, but they’re keeping that close to the chest. 
And if things fall apart come December, Mattel will be free to make a movie with another studio, though they can’t bring over story elements or actors. 
We’ll have more on the Barbie situation as it develops. 
Want more io9 news? 
Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.3%Justin Carter: 5.2%Gizmodo: 3.5%Confirmation Bias16.3%This article: 6.1%Justin Carter: 1.4%Gizmodo: 1.2%Anchoring Bias6.1%This article: 26.0%Justin Carter: 3.3%Gizmodo: 2.9%Availability Heuristic26.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.3%Gizmodo: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.8%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.8%Gizmodo: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%Justin Carter: 4.9%Gizmodo: 4.7%Framing Effect11.3%This article: 16.3%Justin Carter: 1.0%Gizmodo: 0.6%Loss Aversion16.3%This article: 5.2%Justin Carter: 1.1%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.8%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Justin Carter: 4.1%Gizmodo: 3.5%Optimism Bias6.6%This article: 29.0%Justin Carter: 2.2%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias29.0%This article: 16.0%Justin Carter: 7.0%Gizmodo: 7.3%Negativity Bias16.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Justin Carter: 0.6%Gizmodo: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error4.7%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Justin Carter: 4.2%Gizmodo: 2.3%Halo Effect8.8%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.4%Justin Carter: 2.1%Gizmodo: 1.4%Recency Bias12.4%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.4%Justin Carter: 2.8%Gizmodo: 3.5%Appeal to Authority14.4%This article: 5.5%Justin Carter: 2.4%Gizmodo: 1.2%False Dilemma5.5%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.6%Justin Carter: 5.7%Gizmodo: 4.9%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.3%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 3.2%Gizmodo: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.2%Justin Carter: 3.1%Gizmodo: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.2%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.8%Justin Carter: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.8%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.0%Justin Carter: 4.0%Gizmodo: 1.6%Anecdotal16.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.4%Justin Carter: 1.9%Gizmodo: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.4%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.3%Justin Carter: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.3%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.9%Justin Carter: 6.6%Gizmodo: 3.5%Unattributed Quote6.9%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 2.2%Gizmodo: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 15.2%Justin Carter: 6.1%Gizmodo: 11.4%Biased Writer Voice15.2%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 2.0%Gizmodo: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Justin Carter: 5.8%Gizmodo: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.0%

362 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.7%attributed speech345writer words
Selected voice

David Zaslav

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%David Zaslav: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.6 ptsWriter: 11.6%David Zaslav: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%David Zaslav: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.