Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbie 2 results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 1,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (7,530 of 24,371 topics). This Barbie 2 is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Barbie 2
Topic details
Total words: 1,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Middle Ground: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos