Author summary
50% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Toohey results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 2,132 hits . Analysis detected 17,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,112 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (7,179 of 8,938 authors). This Grace Toohey is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Grace Toohey
Author details
Total words: 26,112
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles26.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst