Author summary
100%2 analyzed articles/videos149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Times results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 35.9% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 596 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.1% and a BS Rank of 98% (236 of 8,974 authors). This Los Angeles Times is worse (more manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Los Angeles Times
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
98%Los Angeles Times (selected)14%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 596
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510097.4% percentile
13.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles596 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 35.9%35.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 28.5%28.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 23.8%23.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 20.3%20.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.8%16.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 16.4%16.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 7.7%7.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 23.5%23.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Author 35.9%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Author 28.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Author 23.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 23.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 20.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 16.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos