Topic summary
99% 16 analyzed articles/videos 1,515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Series results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 63.9% saturation with 2,904 hits . Analysis detected 15,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,545 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,183 of 23,346 topics). This World Series is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. World Series
Topic details
Total words: 4,545
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.9% percentile 10.4% BS Score16 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 63.9% 63.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 47.0% 47.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 33.0% 33.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 29.0% 29.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 31.2% 31.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 25.3% 25.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 24.0% 24.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 16.9% 16.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 18.3% 18.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 63.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 47.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 33.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 31.2%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 29.0%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% No True Scotsman: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst