Topic summary
94% 12 analyzed articles/videos 7,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Powers results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 5,007 hits . Analysis detected 33,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,004 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (16,177 of 23,259 topics). This War Powers is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. War Powers
Topic details
Total words: 36,004
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score12 analyzed articles36K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst