Topic summary
74% 15 analyzed articles/videos 11,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vladimir Putin results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 4,537 hits . Analysis detected 36,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,322 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,629 of 22,713 topics). This Vladimir Putin is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group. Vladimir Putin
Topic details
Total words: 43,322
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score14 analyzed articles43.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst