Topic summary
87% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vehicle Recalls results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,352 hits . Analysis detected 6,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,472 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 55% (10,178 of 22,261 topics). This Vehicle Recalls is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group. Vehicle Recalls
Topic details
Total words: 6,472
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst