Topic summary
72% 16 analyzed articles/videos 12,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utility Regulation results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 3,966 hits . Analysis detected 33,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,008 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 10% (22,183 of 24,576 topics). This Utility Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Utility Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 56,008
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.7% percentile 1.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles56K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst