Topic summary
77% 31 analyzed articles/videos 18,635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Israel Relations results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 13,283 hits . Analysis detected 113,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 112,079 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 32% (14,939 of 21,868 topics). This US Israel Relations is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. US Israel Relations
Topic details
Total words: 112,079
Article count: 31
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score31 analyzed articles112.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst