Topic summary
84% 11 analyzed articles/videos 13,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Turkey results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 4,708 hits . Analysis detected 44,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 52,740 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (17,035 of 22,514 topics). This Turkey is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Turkey
Topic details
Total words: 52,740
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles52.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst