Topic summary
96% 39 analyzed articles/videos 35,815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Administration Policies results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 23,560 hits . Analysis detected 171,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 157,484 analyzed words across 39 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 40% (14,385 of 23,769 topics). This Trump Administration Policies is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Trump Administration Policies
Topic details
Total words: 157,484
Article count: 39
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score39 analyzed articles157.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst