Topic summary
⁠37%2 analyzed articles/videos1,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trademark Infringement results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 2,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,600 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (16,552 of 22,395 topics). This Trademark Infringement is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Trademark Infringement
Topic details
Total words: 4,600
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos