Topic summary
13% 7 analyzed articles/videos 9,473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Threat Intelligence results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 1,435 hits . Analysis detected 11,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,004 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (23,621 of 23,944 topics). This Threat Intelligence is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Threat Intelligence
Topic details
Total words: 37,004
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 0.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles37K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst