Topic summary
88% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The View results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 2,882 hits . Analysis detected 18,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,840 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 48% (12,936 of 24,545 topics). This The View is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. The View
Topic details
Total words: 15,840
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.2% 18.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst