Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Rib Woman results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 1,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (8,257 of 22,481 topics). This The Rib Woman is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
The Rib Woman
Topic details
Total words: 2,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.3%29.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos