Topic summary
82%78 analyzed articles/videos72,159 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Rulings results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 47,370 hits. Analysis detected 348,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 298,848 analyzed words across 78 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (13,302 of 22,909 topics). This Supreme Court Rulings is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score78 analyzed articles298.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.8%15.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

After SCOTUS Ruling, Michigan Agrees To End ‘Talk Therapy’ Ban For Gender-Confused Kids44%
The Federalist95%By Shawn Fleetwood78%7/31/2026, 8:21:39 AM
Trump wants the Supreme Court to give him the unilateral power to rewrite election law9%
Vox68%By Ian Millhiser67%7/29/2026, 11:15:00 AM
Here’s How an Under-the-Radar Court Decision Could Bolster Oklahoma’s Political Parties5%
Oklahoma Watch13%By Keaton Ross0%7/29/2026, 4:00:00 AM
A Stunning Shift in Public Opinion Post-Dobbs16%
The American Prospect45%By Makela Reid29%7/25/2026, 2:00:00 AM
Haitians, Hondurans, Salvadorans cope with protected status decision11%
Las Vegas Sun65%By Associated Press74%7/23/2026, 8:57:00 AM
The Supreme Court says states may protect fair opportunity for women and girls62%
Washington Examiner84%By Connor Bolster82% Tom Jipping80%7/21/2026, 5:45:53 PM
By Firing Election Bureaucrats, Trump Is Just Doing What SCOTUS Ruled He Can Do53%
The Federalist95%By M.D. Kittle84%7/20/2026, 4:14:20 AM
After the Supreme Court killed his first tariffs, Trump turns to a new legal workaround to impose 25% tariffs on Brazil and possibly others41%
Fortune74%By Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez57%7/17/2026, 2:28:52 PM
Illinois Will Finally Stop Stripping People of Their Home Equity—3 Years After the Supreme Court Outlawed It51%
Reason.com61%By Billy Binion63%7/16/2026, 2:05:26 PM
No, Congress can’t just overrule the Supreme Court on birthright citizenship57%
Reason.com61%By Damon Root70%7/16/2026, 4:00:58 AM