Topic summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Superheroes results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 553 hits. Analysis detected 3,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (5,553 of 21,961 topics). This Superheroes is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Superheroes
Topic details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos