Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strange Junji Itos Tales For Sleepless Nights results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 1,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (8,629 of 24,545 topics). This Strange Junji Itos Tales For Sleepless Nights is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Strange Junji Itos Tales For Sleepless Nights
Topic details
Total words: 2,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.3%29.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos