Topic summary
⁠3%2 analyzed articles/videos603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ssi Payments results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 299 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,412 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (18,711 of 23,723 topics). This Ssi Payments is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Ssi Payments
Topic details
Total words: 2,412
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos