Topic summary
96% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Governance results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 5,382 hits . Analysis detected 25,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,808 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 66% (8,073 of 23,390 topics). This Sports Governance is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Sports Governance
Topic details
Total words: 16,808
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 32.0% 32.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst