Author summary
86% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Hampton results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,931 hits . Analysis detected 13,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,504 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,844 of 8,538 authors). This Daniel Hampton is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Daniel Hampton
Author details
Total words: 11,504
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst