Topic summary
65% 33 analyzed articles/videos 26,845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 6,952 hits . Analysis detected 66,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 110,242 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (19,935 of 21,637 topics). This Space is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Space
Topic details
Total words: 110,242
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score33 analyzed articles110.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst