Author summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MARCIA DUNN AP aerospace writer results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 294 hits . Analysis detected 1,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,338 of 9,118 authors). This MARCIA DUNN AP aerospace writer is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. MARCIA DUNN AP aerospace writer
Author details
Total words: 3,836
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst