Topic summary
21%7 analyzed articles/videos1,920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Solar Eclipse results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 816 hits. Analysis detected 5,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,164 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 18% (20,445 of 24,696 topics). This Solar Eclipse is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.2% percentile
1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate