Topic summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos1,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smart Tvs results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 394 hits. Analysis detected 2,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,050 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (11,408 of 22,828 topics). This Smart Tvs is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Smart Tvs
Topic details
Total words: 4,050
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos