Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video1,169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sisterhood results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 3,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (14,148 of 24,112 topics). This Sisterhood is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Sisterhood
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%4-H Schedule1%
⁠0%4 H Schedule1%
⁠0%Musician Biographies1%
⁠0%Class Analysis1%
⁠0%Cleveland Politics1%
⁠42%Sisterhood (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,676
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos