Topic summary
73% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Judiciary Committee results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,951 hits . Analysis detected 16,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,187 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (12,808 of 24,006 topics). This Senate Judiciary Committee is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Senate Judiciary Committee
Topic details
Total words: 16,187
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst