Topic summary
78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Screening results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 509 hits . Analysis detected 4,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,308 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (12,080 of 22,533 topics). This Screening is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Screening
Topic details
Total words: 5,308
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst