Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scandal Management results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 1,551 hits. Analysis detected 8,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,910 of 22,961 topics). This Scandal Management is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Scandal Management
Topic details
Total words: 3,536
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.3% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 43.9%43.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 21.3%21.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 20.3%20.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.4%14.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 43.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Red Herring: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos