Topic summary
63% 6 analyzed articles/videos 7,905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saturday Night Live results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,229 hits . Analysis detected 10,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,705 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (21,892 of 23,770 topics). This Saturday Night Live is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Saturday Night Live
Topic details
Total words: 19,705
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst