Topic summary
61% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Satellite Internet results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,043 hits . Analysis detected 6,697 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,248 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,909 of 22,424 topics). This Satellite Internet is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Satellite Internet
Topic details
Total words: 8,248
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst