Topic summary
61%5 analyzed articles/videos1,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Satellite Internet results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,043 hits. Analysis detected 6,697 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,248 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,909 of 22,424 topics). This Satellite Internet is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Satellite Internet

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate