Topic summary
38% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safety results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,472 hits . Analysis detected 8,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,382 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (17,785 of 23,835 topics). This Safety is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Safety
Topic details
Total words: 14,382
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst