Author summary
48%2 analyzed articles/videos355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Haskins results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 1,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,048 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 57% (3,734 of 8,526 authors). This Caroline Haskins is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Caroline Haskins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
57%Caroline Haskins (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,048
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos