Topic summary
⁠86%3 analyzed articles/videos1,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Reviews results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,217 hits. Analysis detected 10,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,195 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (10,621 of 22,951 topics). This Restaurant Reviews is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Restaurant Reviews

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos