Author summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Deseran results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 2,559 hits . Analysis detected 14,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,364 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,226 of 9,436 authors). This Sara Deseran is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group. Sara Deseran
Author details
Total words: 12,364
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.7% 20.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.8% 10.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.6%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst