Topic summary
82% 47 analyzed articles/videos 37,503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Religion results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 12,538 hits . Analysis detected 122,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 154,965 analyzed words across 47 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (19,543 of 23,761 topics). This Religion is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Religion
Topic details
Total words: 154,965
Article count: 47
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score47 analyzed articles155K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst