Author summary
70%3 analyzed articles/videos3,268 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julian Borger results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,568 hits. Analysis detected 12,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,072 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,379 of 8,706 authors). This Julian Borger is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Julian Borger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
50%Julian Borger (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,072
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate