Topic summary
97% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,195 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regime Change results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 3,560 hits . Analysis detected 28,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,728 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (10,644 of 23,741 topics). This Regime Change is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Regime Change
Topic details
Total words: 22,728
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst