Topic summary
77% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Recycling results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 1,251 hits . Analysis detected 10,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,264 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (18,319 of 24,545 topics). This Recycling is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Recycling
Topic details
Total words: 16,264
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst