Topic summary
⁠3%2 analyzed articles/videos930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Property Sale results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 474 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (20,453 of 24,545 topics). This Property Sale is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Property Sale
Topic details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos