Topic summary
51% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Elections results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 2,342 hits . Analysis detected 20,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,932 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (19,298 of 22,453 topics). This Presidential Elections is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Presidential Elections
Topic details
Total words: 30,932
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles30.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst