Topic summary
68% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pope Leo Xiv results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 2,424 hits . Analysis detected 16,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,096 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 22% (19,243 of 24,545 topics). This Pope Leo Xiv is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. Pope Leo Xiv
Topic details
Total words: 23,096
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score9 analyzed articles23.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst