Author summary
48%6 analyzed articles/videos4,698 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan King results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,556 hits. Analysis detected 12,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,826 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (7,987 of 9,137 authors). This Jordan King is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Jordan King
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
13%Jordan King (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 21,826
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510012.6% percentile
1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate