Author summary
65%3 analyzed articles/videos3,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hollie Silverman results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 1,740 hits. Analysis detected 10,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,040 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (6,048 of 9,471 authors). This Hollie Silverman is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Hollie Silverman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
37%Hollie Silverman (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,040
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510036.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate