Topic summary
73% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,862 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Interference results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 2,975 hits . Analysis detected 21,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,430 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (12,163 of 24,407 topics). This Political Interference is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Political Interference
Topic details
Total words: 18,430
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.0% 13.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst