Topic summary
76% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police Community Relations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 666 hits . Analysis detected 5,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,870 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (18,205 of 24,545 topics). This Police Community Relations is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Police Community Relations
Topic details
Total words: 8,870
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst